First | Prev || Next | Last
¿Question #1232?
[Deleted user]: [deleted question]

Caerid: Sure
brunogaia: Probably
pwilz: Only if they want to.
KellumSowers: YES, save the servers
Chris Busse: No.
axeme: No
daveroswell: who cares?
spayne: no
Cringing Dragon: What purpose would this serve? A list which is complete would be inactive, but that doesn't make it of less value than a list which requires constant additions.
R_Dragon: Yes and no,they can refresh them with new material
Skotte: wha..?? I dont see why. There may be some reason here, and maybe I don't understand the question.
Sitnaltax: nah
Bosco312: No. It's the internet. Everything should be saved. Except for Karl Rove's email. ;-)
DHEK: Not unless they want to. Why should they delete it? Someone in future might find it useful.
Butterbane: that would be wise
mike86: yes
nerman8r: no
jeffwolfe: No.
aleo09: no.
ZiggyZambo: no
GuyHill: depends on content
ZeroZilla: No, they're great for cross-referencing when new related-topic lists appear. Often they're added as links, and I think that's extraordinarily useful.
Guuthulhu: No.
Son of Murray: But what will we leave for future generations?
dmomo: Maybe
ilovekatusha: how would they check?
Dorque: Nope.
vampywife: If they so choose
Igloo cool: no, but I would like to delete yours
mlanza: Not if it's quality. All quality data should live on!
Helenoftroy: no, why would they do that? Is it taking up too much space?
Loquutus: Sure not.
fFish: eh
cymric: No.
Mike A: Only if their usefulness expires. Now GeekQuestions on the other hand...
SteveK2: depends on this list - many are useful reference points
ZombyDawg: no
jdigaetano: Meh?
GI Joe: No
puffinge: who cares
GrandpaDave: I don't care
Great Dane: Would be nice
Lord_Prussian: Not if they serve a continued purpose in the database.
The Unbeliever: 42
Thunder: Yes!
ThatFalafelGirl: you can DO that?
skrutsch: Yes. Or hide them.
heli: depends on the list
2amp: yes
Favre4MVP: No. They should probably create several new ones just to remind people that they are able to do so.
BaSL: no
scriptorum: No, that's work.
agent easy: no
WasQ: no, I think is a important source of info... included the most silly
Brother Narsis: yes
snoozefest: y
thoia: I don't know, should they?
erli: Yes, why pollute electronic space
HappyProle: No.
tragicpoet: If there are space limitations, sure
midgetsrawk: no
-Johnny-: some of them, yes
Randy Cox: If they no longer serve a purpose. Otherwise, keep 'em for future BGGers
djlg: If they want to.
Karlsen: Depends on the GeekList. Some should stay for reference or posterity, others should be deleted
ptper: no
Debate: No, delete anything with a rating under 5 after 3 months
Oborro: at users discretion
Ryno8: yes
sumo: No, because some of them have lasting interest/appeal/usefulness.
gnomehome: No
Belash: depends on its use...
manowarplayer: no
Johan: No, but if they aren't of general interest they should make them hidden.
Chris__M: No
Gelatinous Goo: I do
kimbo: No. Data should never be deleted. It is of historical value. "Archive instead of delete."
BobDodgerBlue: Depends on the list, if it is good for reference then no
buergerberatung: nope, some are too funny to erase and historicans probably could find this interesting in later ages...
Jackwraith: Yes
yossarians: yes
mfrederick: No. Why?
louiseh: Depends on the content. Making them private is probably fine.
viogression: Depends on what kind of GeekList it is.
RyanMC: no
Blackwind: nah
Grod: No
scribidinus: Only if rated lower than my mine.
dakarp: only if they don't have much useful information.
threlicus: Depends on the list.
CDRodeffer: They should delete them when they are no longer useful to them as a reference. Inactivity has nothing to do with it.
chaddyboy_2000: Depends how informative it is.
Grimwold: Depends on the original purpose... some lists are good to keep, even if there is no more activity on them... others are only fleeting, in which case i say wipe em!
Ludocrazy: Yes
Spielfreak: No, but they should perhaps make them private.
Bluenose: No. Unless asked to.
ynnen: Only if they no longer serve a purpose or interest. Lists with long appeal based on insights, strategies, observations or humor really don't go stale.
m_r_tyler: Only if the information in them is obsolete.
CortexBomb: Only if the Geeklist is really dated, was for a specific purpose, or didn't have very much interesting data on it. It kind of concerns me that a lot of the old ones have been deleted because oftentimes the lists have more useful data than the game entries do
klarkinhistrep: Only some
jttm: Depends on ratings I suppose
ValJor: Depends on the GL.
MisterCranky: Oh come on, the bias in the question makes my answer obvious.
skelebone: No, just hide them. No sense in destroying all of your work just because it's old.