First | Prev || Next | Last
¿Question #1831?
puffinge: Were we really meant to have sex with only one person for the rest of our lives?

Woelf: Some people don't even do that.
JVgamer: No. You should read the book "Sex At Dawn".
Felimid: That is the definition of "monogamy" after all. I, for one, prefer to be magnanimous, er, magmatic, er, monotremulous, er, monogamous.
Yugblad: No.
joebelanger: Nope.
TolkienLibrary: guess if you stick to only one person you will never find out!
Phil Fleischmann: Meant by whom? "meant" implies an intention by someone.
jessitron: when we only lived to our 30s, yes
Randy Cox: Or until that person is out of the picture.
Volfield: I certainly don't think so.
Hendal: yes, unless you count your self
ZeroZilla: Yes, but I believe that when we're perfect we'll be better at it in every respect.
cgund: ..
Rosebud: I believe most people who answer yes to this question miss the obvious truth: one person means you, and that's masturbation.
Blacknightjj: no
jrbentley: Absolutely.
smcneil: By "we", you mean you and me together, with only one other person? That's probably a good idea, because if it's for the rest of my life, I really think we're going to need to take turns. I have to go to work in a few hours, and somebody needs to do the laundry.
arkibet: I'm in California, and that answer is clearly no.
hob69: Depends on how much you like to get divorced.
Lost Brews: Yes
dogzard: most definitely, yes
randomguy132: No, then we would be like a jigsaw puzzle and our genitalia would only fit with one other person. There would also have to be geographical limitations or else we wouldn't find them and we'd go extinct.
DHEK: No. But you can, if you want to. This "sex with only one person for the rest of our lives" thing is a culturally-ingrained thing. It's learnt behavior, much like most things.
aleo09: if ur married to them , yes
eddyspaghetti: Are you assigning meaning?
DGSI: if you belief that we are animals..if we look at some of the animal kingdom we see that guys are sposed to try and trick femals and have sex with as many partners and the women are sposed to stay loyal but if you go by human standards it depends if they are swingers are not ot what there moral standrads are...its a loeaded question either way my personal answer..yes
POvidiusNaso: Nope.
xlorp: That would sure let the air out of the tires of the porn industry. There's only so many pictures you can take of one person, even if there were 6 billion people waiting in line for a go.
Leo-T: No. Monogoamy is exceedingly rare in nature. It's actually counterproductive to the species -limits biodiversity.
citizengeek: "We"? No. That would be a bit awkward.
spartax: Umm . . . as long as you both shall live, yes. After that, find someone else.
nm156: No!
dmomo: If any!
Helenoftroy: Yes, it actually makes things a lot less complicated.
interhawk: yes
nibuen: hopefully
mats-k: No, there was no intention at all.
Chaz: NO!!!!!!!!
Firepigeon: of course not!!!
FrozenHoHos: My wife says yes.
Znirk: You're allowed to take a short break every four hours, you know.
BeatPosse: I think we were meant to sow far and wide in the beginning and narrow down
mlanza: No, only during and for the rest of your marriage.
WatchmanX2000: in your case, yes, but please, close the bathroom door from now on so no one else has to know you're playing with yourself.
jasta6: That's what God designed so Yes.............................................................................
brainrob: Yes
dietevil: *sigh*
orodreth: Given that the brain is the largest erogenous zone... perhaps we're all having sex with each other whenever one of us mentions the word sex...?
bigbadsteve: it could be
bekudno: We weren't 'meant' to anything. But it's certainly not how evolution has programmed us, regardless of what we think of the morals.
davedanger: not you
scriptorum: Not you, you're meant to be castrated.
puffinslayer: All of us? Just one person? You mean like Smurfette?
richdknows: yes
Desmondloki: biologically no, contractually yes
MDettmer81: Yes, it's more than trading fluids... it's coming together on every level.
Loquutus: Sure not.
davebo: If so, that person would be real sore by now.
Bahamut-X: I have a cat name, so 9 lives... already got 7... 2 more leady to go... gotta choose them well! :P
Evilnames: Depends on what the meaning of only is.
EDS Teioh: oh, hell no, man
Legend Dan: If we were, I've already fucked that up. Ah well.
GuyHill: no
yoacusna: Well naturally not- we need time to eat and sleep, quite apart from anything else... Oh, I see- you mean "have sex with no more than one person". Certainly not, though there's nothing actually wrong with that.
kimapesan: We? And with what one person?
Gamegrunt: Ideally, yes.
darthcliff: Who is the one person?
slapdash: yeah right
Cavedog_pdx: You mean one at a time, right?
Belash: no, but then yes.
puffinge: No, we weren't meant to, but many of us have chosen that path.
skrutsch: I don't know, but that's my plan.
MisterCranky: Getting a little bit bored, puffinge? Mrs. Puffinge not ruffling the old feathers? Why not call 1-800-Penguin for a good time.
leece: Well no. You're meant to sleep, and go to work and not get arrested in public and stuff. And for the rest of your life - man that's stamina!
ronster0: yeah, just one at a time.
glookose: yes ..ourselves
Lord_Prussian: Yes
mandj2001: >
2amp: i've managed that way for 44+ years now
chad56s: That's what they tell me.
KnobDoctor: You were, anyway.
Karlsen: Depends if you are married or not
berserkley: yes
Raintiger: From a biological standpoint, no.
snoozefest: no
nexttothemoon: Probably not...we'd get very hungry and die..the species wouldn't survive.
Jern: No
dakarp: What do you mean by "meant"?
Toxidyne: Of course not.
tragicpoet: If your married, yes
CDRodeffer: Probably.
djlg: Biologically and evolutionarily, no.
ValJor: No way, this is a very sick way of controlling the people
isolated: Yes. It is better that way. Trust me.
AlorielLelyn: Yes. That's what STDs are here to remind us about...
CortexBomb: Hah, no
chaddyboy_2000: I think so.
skelebone: We were meant to honor our promises, and if we promise to do just that, then we probably should keep up our end of the deal.
gnomehome: Looking for excuses ?
jttm: No
Blackwind: nope
Dave: Yes, and that person is me!