First | Prev || Next | Last
¿Question #1835?
puffinge: Which game do you like alot with 4 players but hate with 5 or 6?

FilipaPT: The only game I've played with more than 4 players was Uno :( and Uno is great with lot's of players
Gregski: Bridge. The kibitzers can be a real pain.
Vorpaal99: talisman...it takes too long between turns.
Spirit of 70: Twilight Imperium.
Agent AK0047: 4 Square
Woelf: Most of the time I'm lucky enough to just get four. Although, I suspect Settlers would be a lot less fun with more than four.
Hendal: I hate only Othello so far, a lot of games can drag with extra people that is no lie
daveroswell: Dominion
ricardofo: Risk
Polgara: don't like it a lot, but settlers qualifies i think
Wes Hope: carcassonne
cgund: any game where they insist on spelling "a lot" correctly
w0rf: Solitaire
tragicpoet: Halo
DHEK: Cities & Knights of Catan. Well, not really hate it, but it can get really long and draggy with 5-6 players instead of just 4.
WalkerRedEye: cant think of any reallt
TheArchAngel: the more the merrier
eddyspaghetti: Munchkin
2amp: babylon 5 ccg, munchkin
onky: not many.
cluegirl: monopoly
chooi: none really
diehard4life: Any turn based game...
MaksimSmelchak: Settlers of Cataan works much better with two to four than five to six. I wouldn't say hate though. That's a strong word.
Johan: 'Hate' is a bit strong, but I 'prefer' lots of games with 4 rather than 5 or 6.
Capitaine Grappin: Carcasonne
greglios: Hate is too strong but I definitely prefer Power Grid with four compared to 5 or 6. Likewise Alhambra.
W Eric Martin: Fiese Freunde Fette Feten.
bigbadsteve: solitaire
vampywife: Password
igorl: Chinatown
WatchmanX2000: you're assuming I like more than 2 players.
Kit Silverfox: Mostly role playing games
gironha: Starfarers of Catan.
SteveK2: Settlers of Catan
Scott Tepper: Alhambra
Fawkes: Hate? Nada.
confuse_a_cat: Euchre
dietevil: Runebound
dakarp: definitely Settlers of Catan.
brainrob: Age of Steam
javelin98: Risk.
Lord_Prussian: History of the World bogs down considerably with more than 4
ssmooth: except for games that simply don't accommodate more than 4, I really can't think of one
Ludocrazy: Alhambra
The Unbeliever: 42
bluebehir: I have found no such game at present time.
ThatFalafelGirl: Elfenland and Bohnanza.
WasQ: Runebound, and better more with 3
KnobDoctor: No idea.
boneroller: Wiz-War
MisterCranky: Hearts
chad56s: Citadels
snoozefest: runebound? not sure
Windopaene: Alhambra
gnomehome: Alhambra with 5 is an ungame
kennyb: nothing comes to mind
nerotora: Age of Steam
toulouse: Age of Steam
LudesFactor: the only one i can think of is Titan
erli: Age of Steam
darthcliff: Chess
puffinge: Barbarossa and Settlers
heli: Express comes to mind, but there are many. man-y.
Wintergoblin: Monopoly the card game
Cromaa: Never get to play games with that many people
GuyHill: Acquire
CDRodeffer: Super Chinese Checkers
djlg: Age of Steam
Dave: Alhambra.
CortexBomb: I haven't played enough games at that high of a scale to really have a good answer
chaddyboy_2000: Alhambra.
skelebone: Dunno... that would probably necessitate me getting 5-6 together. I've heard Alhambra is worse with more than 3-4.
jttm: PR
Spielfreak: dunno
Blackwind: not sure
sos1: Schrille Stille