First | Prev || Next | Last
¿Question #197?
Der Das: GeekQuestions, good or bad?

FilipaPT: Good
sparkous: good
Ghidorah3x: Splunge
Damjon: Neither. Pointless would be my observation
BOBBYCAN: Who are we to judge?
oldhoss: Try 'em with a turkey baster and let me know what you think.
pricero1: Darned ugly.
Darazel: Bad
Woelf: Banana.
ricardofo: good
Narlgoth: Bad. So, so bad. My eyes hurt, I hate the stupid questions, my brain is running out of my ears and I've only got another 25,000 more questions to go... :- X
bcooperok: Eh. Like anything else, when done in moderation... Crap is it really past midnight?
arkibet: good
vandemonium: 42, "..", diet coke and yellow.
Capt O: mostly good
MotUfan: Depends largely on the questions being asked. On the whole, pretty good.
LazarusDarkeyes: So far, I am NOT impressed.
Blott: I like the idea, but they seem to have just become a place to goof around.
captkayoss: Good
Ludocrazy: good
Blade Spirit: Good
shteev: GeekQuestions is without doubt the single greatest thing I've ever seen on any website.
mrmarcus: I dunno.
jeffwolfe: No.
william_henshaw: It is both good and bad and neither
warpozio: depends on the question
DHEK: Goooooood. Now why would it be bad?
aleo09: overall good
Gnarlythotep: Both. Sometimes simultaneously.
onky: bad.
_Kael_: ...or something in betweed...
LordT: Some good, many bad
woonklepuff: Mostly bad
Numskull: A little from Column A, a little from Column B.
ZiggyZambo: awesome
KentuckyKid: Ehh.
Benzebub: Non-committal thus far.
mneme: Kinda mediocre.
SybotCB: Okay
KingMob: Good
vampywife: superfantastic!
Glenn: :/
jasta6: good............................................................................................
brainrob: Depends on the questioner ...
Helenoftroy: ugly
LemonyFresh: Good. When they're not abused.
Syrion: Bad.
Odat: I'm still deciding.
Loquutus: Good and bad are figments of your imagination
Freitag: good timewaster.
POvidiusNaso: Good filler.
beakermyers: Good and bad
xlorp: Depends on the style, wit and grace of our fellow geeks...
Tushratta: Addictive
EDS Teioh: neutral evil
Legend Dan: If you don't like 'em, don't answer them. It doesn't make BGG cost any more.
dakarp: good
Mease19: ok
sourwyrm: i can't stop.....
skrutsch: neutral
Lord_Prussian: They are a good thing.
izernechel: Good...mostly
deadkenny: Bad - waste of time - somebody please help me, can't stop myself. Next....
leece: Geek Questions are neither good nor bad, they are just an amusing waste of time.
rdmasters: There is no good or bad. Just questions and answers.
BaSL: gooooooooood
hotspur: Yawn
goldenboat: Yes.
kennyb: three thumbs up!
Ivan: Good.
agent easy: undecided
erli: Good
Belash: indifferent
2amp: few are good; most are crap
klellingson: Good
Karlsen: Good if you approve of brainsuck activities
scriptorum: So far, eh.
Quest22: Odd
meshuggener: Not really sure. Do they server a purpose?
seanp: amoral
DenverWolf: bad
AlorielLelyn: Good
shippert: I'm offended by this question
bucklen_uk: Variable ...
Nightmare: Bad... spend too much time answering them
StormKnight: Highly amusing
BobDodgerBlue: Good, mostly
alfredhw: MetaGeekQuestions: Bad. Thought-provoking questions that give us a look inside the lives of our fellow geeks, in the world of games and reality: Good.
puffinge: 7
Grimwold: the idea is good... some of the questions though... are very, very bad.
Mordachai: or ugly?
Blackwind: different
mfrederick: Fair
isolated: Time vampire...that's what they are.
BrokenNails_NZ: Seems okay so far
DangerMouse: Good
Young David: Mweh
geberus: good
Vince Londini: not really impressed so far - charge for them - 2GG/each
raolsson: Bad. I thought this was going to be more informative.
djflippy: They are a fun diversion
djlg: Damn evil time-hole-sucking geekquestions.
Shakar: Good.
chaddyboy_2000: Good.
ejmowrer: Good until they bring the site down and become permanently 'temporarily' disabled.
Pseudo Nymh: Good. Anything to keep me from working.
snoozefest: bad
netfilterz: Fun diversion
MisterCranky: On the whole good, but this one isn't winning any popularity contests.
jttm: Good
queequeg: okay
darquil: Good.
Eric Haas: Yes
Rubric: Kind of like putting your tongue on a battery as a kid. Not "good" exactly, but you can't stop doing it.
mschlat: Good, but how do they help humanity?
simon craddock: Good
statonv: Bad in a very time suck kind of way.
Nomadik: Neutral
Reloaded: funny
kimbo: Surprisingly interesting.
Scott Tepper: They're Grrrrrrrrrrreeeeeaaat!
WasQ: good
TamiWhitsett: funny
PghArch: Good for "special occasions".
mrbeankc: bad
nexttothemoon: eh
tragicpoet: Good till the last drop
seppo21: I would say that the questions themselves are not moral entities. Not being such, they are not inherently good or bad.
berserkley: Good, for now...
Lardarse: Depends on whatever question I happen to draw next. ;-)
Hallow: good
dietevil: Good (timekiller)
Aldie: Good.
Mike A: Yes.
CDRodeffer: Time sink
dklx3: good
shotokanguy: is there a middle category?
Donkey Thong: Bad for productivity
Ebon Wendigo: Yes
HBGlover: Frikin' awesome.
Linnaeus: Good, but evil
louiseh: Good
IngredientX: Fantastic. It's like a robo-Tom Vasel!
tomski: Good
Zambogirl: goood
bard: Great!
CortexBomb: My fleeting time on this earth makes me want to answer bad, but they're so fun
Spielfreak: bad, but apparently addictive
ynnen: Excellent -- for the decent questions that required at least a modicum of thought.
Friendless: hmmmm, until now, good.
skelebone: Good, somewhat mindlessly entertaining. I bet reading answer sheets is a good time.
Dante_Cubit: Mildly entertaining
ping9x: Good
ValJor: Good, good, good!!!
shumyum: ugly
TD2008YDS: ok
Snooze_uk: Some are bad...... :)
Jon_1066: Bad
gnomehome: Time absorbing
LudesFactor: too early to tell
Debate: Cool, but rapidly spiraling out of control. Maybe limit questions asked to one per Geek?
Flyspeck23: Good.