First | Prev || Next | Last
¿Question #2115?
kennyb: Moores Law...please prove true or false...

Woelf: No.
DenGad: true or false = true by logical definition
rseater: 1=2. QED
vandemonium: If something is true it is. If it isn't it's false. Therefore, ergo and ie., Q.E.D. etc.
Hubsi1w6: Law? I didn't do it!
BloodyJack: No.
Chris Page: False. About a dozen years ago processer speed increased faster than Moore's law "predicted."
DHEK: What was that law already...?
elirlandes: Hmmmmmmmm.
aleo09: don't know it
BobMaysJr: True so far - but eventually it'll be false.
Valien: I double my answers every 18 months.
brainrob: Broadly true - it just is!
PsyJam: No
jasta6: Do your own homework this time, OK..................................
bigbadsteve: i am not at liberty to divulge that information at the present time
confuse_a_cat: What is ln(the number of subatomic particles in the universe)/ln 2? That should provide a good upper bound for us.
Tushratta: True. I bought a Canon 3.2 megapixel digital SLR for $2500. Six months later, Canon released a 6.3 megapixel digital SLR for $1900. Ten months after that they released a 8.3 megapixel digital SLR for $1400. Yes. Moore's law is alive and kickin' me in the rear.
double_ones: true. the proof is in the pudding. it's a Law - it does not need to be proven.
themagni: Intel keeps changing what Moore's law is. It's neither true nor false; it is merely marketing.
flyinghogfish: Wha?
GI Joe: Never heard of it
Belash: ok
m_r_tyler: I need Moore information to answer this question.
The Unbeliever: 42
skrutsch: Moore was a cofounder of Intel. Wasn't that the chip that couldn't do math?
leece: I think that's been adequately demonstrated already.
BaSL: can't I guess?
HappyProle: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/0/03/700px-Wgsimonmooreslaw001.jpg
Lord_Prussian: Never liked proofs
KnobDoctor: Can you hold on for a few years?
MisterCranky: Garry Moore stated that Roger Moore was useless. By De Morgan's law, we know that the negated conjunction of Garry and Roger is equivalent to the disjunction of their negations. E Pluribus Unum, ipso facto, q.e.d.
2amp: Sir Roger?
snoozefest: no proof here
Jern: Yeah, right
puffinge: It's much like more potato salad.
nexttothemoon: True and will probably be an underestimate eventually.
gnomehome: What ?
dakarp: Not possible. It has held so far, but will break down eventually.
djlg: I'm right and you're wrong. Ner, ner, ner! Q.E.D.
Flyspeck23: Uh, I can't. Sorry. But so far it hasn't been proven false (AFAIK).
chaddyboy_2000: Umm.
jttm: Whats Moores Law?
AlorielLelyn: It helps if you state what the law is...
CDRodeffer: True thus far, but inevitably false.
Spielfreak: no
Blackwind: no
skelebone: It's true because I sait it is. Taa-daa.