First | Prev || Next | Last
¿Question #2357?
toulouse: Should there be question police?

Gerdion: No sir, officer
Varduk: With this one as a template. Definitely.
nukeu666: freedom of speech
Spirit of 70: No.
Shamurai: Would they have to be paid?
Felimid: Yes and no. Yes ... the questioner themselves should police themselves prior to clicking on "save". No ... because the answerer can always skip or never answer a question they don't like. This, I believe, is called free will (not the mandate of the peanut gallery).
Frubgarde: Of course not. What a stupid idea.
jessitron: No. MisterCranky is close enough.
Polgara: no
arkibet: why not... the uniforms are hot
Valkerie32: "You are under arrest for suspicion of asking dumb questions." ... Nah.
ZiggyZambo: no
ZeroZilla: Naturally.
mrspank: Nah... then we'd miss out on questions like this one.
ironsizide: Nyet.
DHEK: No, but the questions should be moderated in some way for quality-control issues.
aleo09: yes
diehard4life: no
GrimJester: See that van parked across the street?
TaliaIsabelle: Nah
bigbadsteve: they are much like rules lawyers
SisyphusX: No. Bad questions will just get skipped.
brainrob: Yes
GuyHill: yes, and I should be in it
Shotmagnet: why not? the 1st amendment is due to be repealed anyway
scriptorum: Should pigs fly?
Kazin: Maybe.. But are you sure this question would be approved?
Mordachai: How about vigilantees?
orodreth: If you have to question the existence of the question police, then you are beyond all hope.
TheBoch: Sure Why Not?
fFish: The y sure would have a hard time interrogating with only statements.
LemonyFresh: No
acetate3: no
chillrunr: no
dietevil: no
POvidiusNaso: Well, we do need more cops.
JimPAX: What are you, a totalitarian? Or just a republican? Ooops. No difference.
puffinge: Well there are 77 deleted questions, so some policing is going on already apparently.
BaSL: no
Lord_Prussian: No
kytmuisco: Yes, there definitely should.
Hallow: yes, and paid quite well
skrutsch: I guess.
ValJor: Most indeed yes
heli: what makes you think there aren't already?
Randy Cox: Maybe
mrbeankc: Against the wall and spread 'em dirtball!! *insert sirens here*
ssmooth: Would they ticket questions like this one?
leece: I think there already are.
2amp: yes, but it would be too time consuming
lwheeler: No
BaluMG: yes
bluebehir: apparantly, I would dare say so, yes.
Bearcat89: Non. That is what the Never Answer button is for.
erli: No
Basilius: this is a family website, so probably.
nexttothemoon: Nah...we need a wild west area where anything goes...if people don't like it just don't look at the seamy and rancid underbelly of BGG that is GeekQuestions. This is one area where you have to purposely look to see the filth...it isn't "in your face" if you don't seek it.
djlg: Yes.Can I be an undercover DI?
skelebone: No, only Question Gendarme.
snoozefest: yes
fizzix: The question police... they live inside of my head. The question police, they come to me in my bed. The question police...police... police.
Quest22: Yes
dakarp: only for the most obviously out-of-place questions.
batman: no
CortexBomb: I like the laissez-faire atmosphere, the never answer button makes self-policing an easy option
AlorielLelyn: No
chaddyboy_2000: No.
gnomehome: There should be a 'Answer all further questions from this user with profanity' button.
CDRodeffer: No
Spielfreak: no
jttm: No
Dave: It's too late for that, unless they go back and do massive clean-up.