First | Prev || Next | Last
¿Question #261?
sumo: What else can we rate on BGG?

ocdspectrum: Art.
0Shea0: I give this question 2 pickle jars...
oldhoss: Bowel movements. Ask Puffinge about this morning.
tankexmortis: your mom
Auramine O: each other. I give you a 7.5
bcooperok: I keep waiting for the day we can rate users.
Felimid: Anything that annoys you. :)
Spirit of 70: What else besides what?
Peacefishy: I think the better question would be what could possibly NOT be ranked on BGG??
daveroswell: everything. check out fortress AT and their rating system...They rate Cheetos...
Zarion of Arabel: avatars
Hector Vortac: BBQ joints. I've seen it.
Asmoridin: Components? Is that done? Complexity? Replay-ability?
Wes Hope: dunno, i'm afraid
chockle: Have a separate rating for kids' games.
Decorius: Time, time logged on.
DHEK: Depends on what you know you can rate.
eddyspaghetti: Bits?
aleo09: we used to rate images
familygaming: Individual Magic The Gathering cards! *lol*
dmomo: Not much. ANd you?
LuXo: Our souls.
POvidiusNaso: Games is about it, I think. Though thumb's ups are all over.
ellephai: Good question; I'm not sure. But I'd rather see a halfway decent FAQ than an opportunity to rate anything else.
ZiggyZambo: nothing
Munchkin_Micih: BGG?
falloutfan: I'd like to see the designers ranked and rated, as well as the companies.
Chris Page: We can rate the ratings of other people. Recursively.
mats-k: Sushi
brainrob: The quality of GeekQuestions
DougOrleans: GeekQuestions
hacksword: Vin Diesel
bigbadsteve: geekbuddylists?
dudeshouse: ratings
illicit: Whip them out, boys.
scriptorum: Other ratings!
sourwyrm: geek questions
Lord_Prussian: Geekquestions
chrisesko: Each other?
skrutsch: Questions. Ads. Answers. Spelling.
Musti: Geekquestions
mandj2001: can we rate ratings?
r2mites: How stupid (or good in this case) these questions are.
puffinge: GeekQuestions and answers
otrex: Questions.
snoozefest: not enough yet
AWildEep: This question
toulouse: these questions
2amp: seems to be wide open. even tic-tac-toe got a listing...
heli: no doubt there's something
batman: user names
Randy Cox: People
kennyb: game complexity
Cavedog_pdx: Geekquestions and Geekanswers
isolated: Usernames.
WasQ: users
AlorielLelyn: Boardgame related clothing, toys, electronics
tragicpoet: Mp3's listened to while voting
dakarp: Maybe someday we'll be able to rate
Jackwraith: Kitchen tile.
Blackwind: how about we berate some things?
thoia: 1 - 10 rating on geek questions.
CortexBomb: French restaurants
Mozbink: People.
Bluenose: EVERYTHING!!
Grimwold: GeekQuestions... and the answers thereto
djlg: Everything! Questions, answers, replies, users, avatars, usernames, locations, designers, publishers, spelling, grammar, headlines, geekspeaks, advertisements, collections, emoticons, ...
geberus: worth of questions, as we answer them
jwlantz: I think it might be important to rate games based on the gender of the player. I have found my wife and I have similar game tastes that seem to coincide with other couples.
fizzix: Grammar
game_boy: Avatars and usernames.
Michael Becker: my answers would be fun
BobDodgerBlue: Avatars and GeekBadges
Dave: Features.
dietevil: Other users.
jens_hoppe: Users?
jttm: Questions!
funkhauser: I can see it now: BoardGameGeeks, Hot or Not
yossarians: users
JeremyVS: These answers.
queequeg: a game's "strategy" rating, i.e. how strategic vs. lucky is it
netfilterz: GeekQuestions
darquil: Other people's ratings
Eric Haas: Ratings
scribidinus: Games only. I think anonymous ratings of user submissions were a terrible idea anyway. It is the most offensively anti-social part of this site. PERIOD
EYE of NiGHT: Users.
seppo21: I think we should be able to rate GeekQuestions and GeekAnswers. That was a little too obvious. Let's rate Avatars and GeekBadges.
ValJor: Users! I give Fawkes a 10!
silverpenny: Avatars!
CDRodeffer: These questions?
viogression: Ratings.
nerman8r: Avatars!
HBGlover: Each other.
LudesFactor: IQs
nix342: GeekQuestions (I give this one a 6)
MisterCranky: Wherever our self-importance can take us.
Gregarius: How about individual Geeks? That could be a much more efficient way to ostracize.
Ryno8: belch mp3s
PopeBrain: http://www.ratemypoo.com/ratemy/poo
hibikir: Questions, avatars, monkeys on the moon
Jon_1066: I rate this question a 3
Claytonius Maximus: This question = it gets a '1' from me
Zambogirl: hopefully nothing
Spielfreak: GeekQuestions
skelebone: Each other.
Friendless: Witty responses to stupid questions
AnakinOU: Users.
Flyspeck23: GeekQuestions. 3
chaddyboy_2000: These questions.
Shakar: Users, links, etc. everything is rateable if we want.
ping9x: Optimal Players/game
Dante_Cubit: Box fart's been done, so how about writing styles of GeekLists?
gnomehome: Let's try rating games !
Debate: GeekQuestions
Snooze_uk: Questions.