First | Prev || Next | Last
¿Question #3019?
[Deleted user]: [deleted question]

daveroswell: No. NO.
Grievver: 1) nah... 2) If the database can handle it, so can we
gberry: no to the first part and yes delete this question now
Polgara: no, no
Numskull: No and no.
LordDarkSith: no
Asmoridin: a) No, b) Sure?
Boot2daHead: No. No.
Blacknightjj: yes.........and i think we should be able to vote to delete.
diemacher: Probably would improve the quality, I agree
DHEK: No. No.
InShaneee: A. Not that much, maybe .5 GG. B. I think the opportunity should be offered to renew them with GG.
themagni: That's rather elistist of you.
elirlandes: a. No. b. No.
aleo09: no. no.
tmcconville: Please, lead by example.
tipigi: no, no
Csigs: Ummm ... c) Ross Perot
greglios: a) No that's ridiculous. b) No cos I haven't answered them all yet.
Walsfeo: (a) Sure, after the first one. Everyone should get one free question. (b) Absolutely yes, starting with this one.
dmomo: No. No.
xandryyte: They tried charging GG for asking questions, didn't go over well... And hell no on the second part... GeekQuestions are fun ;)
cln777: a) no b) you should be able to delete your own questions
Case: No, No
jasta6: No...................No............................how would I get into the lead if all Q's were deleted....
Nekura: Why and why?
Johan: No and no.
Gwahlur: (a) I think not (b) No, I don`t see how they could be harmful to someone
mrspank: No.
brainrob: yes and yes
bekudno: a) dunno.. maybe b) no
confuse_a_cat: I don't think that there should be a charge for asking GQs. Instead of deleting old questions, maybe they could be put into categories based upon keywords or something.
dietevil: no
_Kael_: Would spare me a lot of time answering
DaGen: no & no
Loquutus: no
phoeniix: eh? and spoil the fun for people who spend 16 hours a day asking geek questions?
GI Joe: No and no
javelin98: No, and no
scriptorum: a) yes, b) no, but they should be archived or flagged
mummbles: (a) yeah at least, (b) why not create a questions v0.1 archive for them.
mrbeankc: No on the first and no on the second.
POvidiusNaso: You probably support a national sales tax, too.
sourwyrm: yes no
MisterCranky: Two part answer: You should go to hell, and you should do it quickly.
Ludocrazy: No. There wouldn't be any questions if there were.
2amp: yes, yes
ValJor: a) Yes, but only after the first three questions; b) not all should be deleted, but those that are plain stupid should. You know what I'm talking about.
Lord_Prussian: Yes and I would not be opposed to it.
deadkenny: Yes. No.
Gecko23: No, and No.
AWildEep: yes, and why not?
djlg: Yes. No, just deprecate them to 2nd class.
BaSL: no&no. If someone doesn't like GQ's, they should go to the forum for more serious questions.
Mike A: (a) No, but there should be a Tip Jar for good answers. Whenever someone tips a good answer, a matching GG is removed from the askers account and given to that answerer as well. (b) They should be left alone after (a) is implemented.
skelebone: No, no charge for GeekQuestions, because then only the GeekWealthy could ask them. And there also is no reason to purge an extant database.
Randy Cox: (a) Not unless you want to see the GeekQuestions feature become totally unused (b) Now that's just silly
heli: nah
puffinge: I'll play by whatever rules are implemented. If there's a charge for a GQ, Iwill certainly stop asking, which I suppose is what you want, but so will most others, and won't that make this fun? An ignore this user is fine but it won't help the answer-all-questions-crew. Why would we delete all the existing stuff? I don't get that. Hey have you tried using the never answer button? Did you know you can bring up all the questions of someone you like and answer them instead of generating random questions?
jttm: No and no
The Unbeliever: 42
DangerMouse: Not a bad idea. I also think there should be a way to ignore all questions from any given user.
chaddyboy_2000: No, no.
snoozefest: a) YES! b) probably not
Spielfreak: no ; no
CDRodeffer: Yes and no, but there could be a time expiration on them.
CortexBomb: I'd say we're already beyond the point of no return, what's the point in bothering now?
Tim Synge: (a) No. This would be discriminatory. (b) No. It would lead to a lot of the same questions being asked all over again, and I really don't want to have to read them again. (c) Are you also advocating deleting old GeekLists, old forum articles etc etc?