First | Prev || Next | Last
¿Question #3844?
puffinge: If you ignore the fact that there are too many of them, how would you rate my questions on a scale of 1 to 10?

Woelf: 7.5 -- It used to be 8, but your score has gone done due to lack of recent content.
stevesack439: 1
pricero1: They are clearly best in class. I should add, though, that with the demise of Brentoon, the retirement of Randy Cox and the deletion of MisterCranky's questions, it is a class of one.
Damocles346: 1
Jatoha: 11
BThayer: 7.5
TiwazTyrsfist: Mostly down in the 2 range, with the occasional 10 thown in.
popsicola: 2
pwilz: Yeah, a scale of 1 to 10 sounds like a reasonable way to rate your questions.
Hendal: worth 72 green beans
Zarion of Arabel: between 1 and 10
DKahnt: 7
vandemonium: Most of them are a solid 8.
ctrzn: 7 very amusing.
Tim Synge: Putting aside the temptation to ask "Is 1 high or low?", I'll say that they are right up there with Mr Cranky's. Entertaining, intelligent, well thought out, rarely showing evidence of grammatical error or an inability to spell, witty, amusing, diverting, entertaining, intelligent, well thought out, rarely showing evidence of grammatical error or an inability to spell, witty, amusing, diverting, entertaining, intelligent, well thought out, rarely showing evidence of grammatical error or an inability to spell, witty, amusing, diverting, entertaining, intelligent, well thought out, rarely showing evidence of grammatical error or an inability to spell, witty, amusing, diverting, entertaining, intelligent, well thought out, rarely showing evidence of grammatical error or an inability to spell, witty, amusing, diverting, entertaining, intelligent, well thought out, rarely showing evidence of grammatical error or an inability to spell, witty, amusing, diverting, entertaining, intelligent, well thought out. Just send the money to the usual place, both of you. Thanks.
Blacknightjj: 8
DHEK: It ranges wildly from 1 to 10 depending on whether you've been behaving yourself or not.
ZiggyZambo: 8 1/2
gf_ripper: 7
POvidiusNaso: 6.
aleo09: i don't look @ the person name
Zacratorax: 5
Beyak: I haven't paid attention to which ones were your's
2amp: well, i don't have a comprehensive list in front of me, i don't know what % i've seen/answered & you don't specify if 1 is good or bad. So, what was the question?
cluegirl: 10,...very entertaining! = )
zonk67: i
tagger418: 3
tipigi: 1.5
ellephai: Probably a 7, because they're good questions and I'm usually willing to answer them.
Cut & Space: 3.1416
Cromaa: Don't pay attention to who posted the question
heli: 6 maybe -- honestly I don't always look who asked
rodeodoctor: 7
Chris Page: Six, with a standard deviation of two.
Nekura: 8.3718975
scriptorum: I'll give you an 8 for diversity of content, but you land a rotten 2 for your damnable persistence and quantity.
Helenoftroy: 7
Big Bad Lex: zero
Platinum Dragon: Eight-hundred-and-fourty-six-billion-and-three.
jasta6: -25
brainrob: 0.5
Tushratta: 6. I'd rate them higher if I could dance to them.
Schwachkopf: 3.14
javelin98: Which one's highest -- 1 or 10?
skrutsch: 7.6
jellospike: 9 when they are gaming-related, 2 otherwise
GI Joe: 6
xlorp: About a 4.
sumo: I give you a nine.
obob: -3
Cavedog_pdx: Better than average so you get an 8.
cobra: -5
Lord_Prussian: I can't ignore that fact. So you get a 1.
jttm: Just because I have bets saying you overtake Cranky, and I don't want to discourage you, I'll say 9
puffinge: Many seem not pleased with them, but I do try to ask a variety of question types, some silly, some serious, some game-related.
Randy Cox: 8
Dave: Pi
skelebone: 3, too many useless ones.
CDRodeffer: e
Spielfreak: I wouldn't
chaddyboy_2000: About a 4.