First | Prev || Next | Last
¿Question #4947?
Randy Cox: If you could be an extra (just standing around in the background) in the next big Spielberg extravaganza, but had to take a week off work and receive no pay for it, would you do it? Now, would you play games at your expense for a week at a con?

ocdspectrum: No. And heck ya!
Fribian: No. Maybe.
Phil Fleischmann: No. Depends on how much expense.
sk8llington: I DO NOT want to be a part of Spielberg filmography (including paying me a succulent extra money). The other is an obvious question and I give you an obviouc answer: YES
bcooperok: D'uh.
pwilz: Well, I think I would do both.
Frubgarde: a) No, b) Yes.
Tushratta: No. No.
Hendal: No, yes
Grubsnatcher: No.
ZeroZilla: I would find it more rewarding to be at the convention, but I couldn't do it without pay.
mdp4828: Geez what an easy question. No and yes.
Gamedeity: No and no
smilingra: Yes, but only if I knew that I would be clearly visible, and if it were shot in a location I could enjoy visiting. I would definitely play games at a con, but I'm not sure if my wife would agree.
Wes Hope: no and no
gantrell: yep, yep
dogzard: No, and yes
Nazhuret: no and no
cleonhard: Yes, and yes (in that order).
ColtsFan76: no and yes
steuz5050: no. no.
GozerinSK: Yes and Its something I have always wanted to do.
Flyspeck23: Yes, and yes.
DHEK: Yes and yes.
aleo09: nope.
Ebon Wendigo: No reason to receive no pay so no I wouldn't.
JimmyJingle: No and no.
WatchmanX2000: No.
jwilhm: Yes, and yes
buffalospynovel: no, no
Leo-T: Yes and yes (have done the second - many times)
PsyJam: Yes, as long as I knew my job would take me back. Dunno about the second question tho.. its a bit confusing?
BLSchoose: no & yes- Prezcon is coming up.
Sideburn: I wouldn't be an extra in a Spielberg movie, but would (no DO!) play/buy games at a con...
ellephai: No. I might want to be an extra in a film (though not his especially), but not enough to take off work or spend money for the opportunity. Would I spend money to go someplace and play games for a week? Hell yes, if I had any.
agamemnon25: no/off course
TStar: I already did both of it. Well not for Spielberg, but for another film.
tdabomb: no, yes
mooka: nope
collezionista: yes
arkibet: Yes. Yes
heatherjberg: yes and i do every year three times a year
brainrob: No and yes
scriptorum: 1. No, that thrill isn't worth $10, let alone a paycheck. I don't dislike Spielberg, I just don't have Hollywood envy. 2. Hmmmm. Hmm. I have not done so yet, but if circumstances were right, perhaps. More of a thrill there. :)
Chris Page: No. I already do.
timsteen: no , no
Datek: maybe; probably not
bigbadsteve: no. it would be tempting
SatanicEssence: No, Yes
Favre4MVP: no. possibly.
Quest22: No. Yes.
SiddGames: No and no.
skrutsch: no, yes
puffinge: Maybe if they filmed it in my living room, and I could SIT in the background, but, even then, no. Sure!
skrebs: No, and no. If it were a PT Anderson film, then yes. And if it was a weekend con, then yes again, but a week is just too danged long.
ssmooth: No. Yes.
POvidiusNaso: I wouldn't do the former, definitely the latter.
javelin98: Yes, and yes
skelebone: I would rather play games than be in a film.
Windopaene: No and yes
Lord_Prussian: Not likely and yes.
chaddyboy_2000: No, yes.
djlg: No (boring). Yes (fun!).
jttm: Nah... maybe for Lucas I would...
CortexBomb: Absolutely not and most definitely
CDRodeffer: No way on the movie, but heck yeah on the gaming con!