First | Prev || Next | Last
¿Question #4978?
Randy Cox: Circumcision: for or against (and I'm not talking about the January 1 church festival celebrating Jesus' circumcision)?

pricero1: I'm not volunteering.
Pithagoras: dont give a shit
TMuscle: I really have no say, I guess it depends on how it is performed and for what reasons.
Septic: Not necessary unless for health reasons.
skrutsch: I honestly don't have an opinion.
jessitron: against.
rseater: cruelty to infants
Frubgarde: I am very attached to my foreskin.
ricardofo: for
oi_you_nutter: ouch
ZeroZilla: I'm waffling on this one. The argument for 'against' is pretty compelling, and I'm familiar with the argument 'for'... and it doesn't really apply anymore. I think I'm leaning toward 'against'.
coyotelaughs: for
xlorp: If I said I was for it, would you hold it against me?
2ndinBeautyContest: aganist
Harkonnen13: uh, yeah
radynski: For.
samidha: Against. It increases the succeptabilty to HIV like woah.
ironsizide: *shrug* no opinion
aleo09: wha
McHaka: against
DHEK: It's an individual's personal choice.
Benzebub: None of your business.
jcarvin: I don't see the point of it (not a pun!). There's no medical or REAL religious reason to do it and it more than often results in loss of feeling! Do you really want to do that to your kid just so that he'll be like everyone else??? I sure hope not!
Decorius: I dont even want to think about it, let alone type an answer.
slowcorner: For?
scriptorum: Neither. I don't care what other men have done to their or their sons' penises.
eddyspaghetti: Undecided.
PsyJam: Neither.. It's a personal choice.
HappiestWookie: agaisnt
wolver: Why does it always have to be black or white?
Nobine: Against
Annoy Mous: For
2amp: Ohh - very scary. Last time I had it done, I couldn't walk for a YEAR!!
puffinge: I believe I'm for, but I haven't studied the topic in great enough detail.
Mixo: If there is a medical indication to it - great! Otherwise: What for? (there is just to many weired religious/cutural harm about it - like female genital mutliation in some cultures)
mats-k: I'd be pissed if someone mutilated me.
rickwar: for
Leo-T: for - stats still show it prevents more problems than it causes
ZiggyZambo: against
tomlynch: There is a festival for that?
BookandGame: Considering recent pediatritian advice, I'm against.
residuetiger: against
Imago: up to personal choice
pattonre: Against
jayjonbeach: Should be at the discression of the parents in question
Solaris: :-o
vampywife: For: it is much easier to care for a circumcises member than an uncircumcised one; also uncircumcised members can trap STD's in the flappy parts (thanks corgigeneral) and make it more likely to catch the disease.
jasta6: against..............................................
Loquutus: against.
natemike: Against.
Kit Silverfox: Circumcision is not nearly an important enough topic for me to care about
kuhrusty: Well when will you be talking about the January 1 church festival celebrating Jesus' circumcision? That sounds like a more interesting question. Especially if, instead of communion wafers, they have you eat little bits of jerky. I'm totally for that!
RealBadMoFo: whatever tickles your pickle
brainrob: Male: whatever is culturally relevant. Female: dead against
djlg: Whatever. Freedom of choice.
POvidiusNaso: For, I guess.
MochaKimono: Ew?
erli: I think this is a question for the guys. However, how can you miss what's been chopped off a long time ago?
skelebone: I only agree with circumscription.
Lord_Prussian: for, I suppose
chaddyboy_2000: For.
CortexBomb: Against, vehemently
CDRodeffer: Generally for.
Spielfreak: for
jttm: Uhh... against