First | Prev || Next | Last
¿Question #3627?
Randy Cox: How 'bout this? Starting now, you can ask up to five questions. Then, you earn the right to ask another question each time one of your questions registers its 25th answer, 50th answer, etc. Evil, huh?

starlighter: These type of question are clearly a threat... they soon become sentient. You see. If question can register itself... see. Requesting immediate delete.
Woelf: Depends if you want to completely kill any and all participation or not.
pricero1: It's a long time since any question got 25 answers...
Frubgarde: Fiendish, Randy. Yawn.
xofour: not evil, but I would forget a whole bunch of questions that way. Which might not be a bad thing.
Der Ubermolch: Oh, I like that plan. I really really do. It would certainly make me more circumspect about which questions I answer.
Infomanohio: Pure evil...
MisterCranky: How about this: If you don't stop coming up with these asinine schemes I will revoke your license to play party games forever.
ZeroZilla: At this late date, very few of my questions have 25 answers, and none have 50. I wouldn't mind having only been allotted five questions, but then I'd have to waste my time some other way...
Polgara: very evil :)
Chris Page: That would've been a good way to start running the zoo.
Flyspeck23: No. I like that idea.
DHEK: Hmmm... interesting concept. Could work, but the restrictions are a bit too tight.
Tall_Walt: No.
TheArchAngel: very, but who would follow that?
aleo09: ok
2amp: nah, then you'd still get 42, lalala, fnord & other similar answers to inflate the total answered
GrimJester: Evil? Gimme a break. But it's too late, the ship has sailed.
vampywife: hmm...evil? i don't think it's that bad, but it's a bit bad, hehe.
darcyj2: I like it!
JonBen: that sounds fun
brainrob: Sounds like a good way of cutting some of the crap
Godeke: What was the question again?
scriptorum: I got two words for you, sir. Randy Cox.
Salt-Man Z: Very evil.
jasta6: Ah... This is a good idea. Then those who ask silly questions have more time to think up better Q's.....I like it!!
bigbadsteve: that would change things dramatically
LemonyFresh: Errrr.....
Loquutus: This is ridiculous. Questions come before answers, just like the head of a horse precedes the back.
Odat: That's like the diet coke of evil. Just one calorie, not evil enough.
Dorque: I like it.
Culvan: Not evil, no. However, it might be solving a problem that doesn't exist.
snoozefest: fine; make the askers pay GG
CharlieWonka: no that's fabulous
mrbeankc: Nahhhh
erli: Oh yeah
djlg: Fantastic.
skrutsch: That's a pretty good idea.
Lord_Prussian: Not really eeeeevil. I also don't think that works as well as just charging some geek gold. You should at least be able to delete your questions as well.
dakarp: Evil. And not much fun.
jttm: Get Aldie to say yes
tipigi: uh...yeah, truly evil...
puffinge: squawk! squawk! squawk!
edosan: Sure, yeah, whatever.
Spielfreak: I think you're overestimating the current response rate of GeekQuestions.
chaddyboy_2000: Great plan, Steve.
skelebone: Sure, but that really takes away the freewheeling spirit. How about you don't ask anymore questions.
CDRodeffer: I probably wouldn't mind that.
heli: mmm, might be too restrictive
Randy Cox: If this rule had been effect when I started, I'd be in trouble, as this is my 43rd question and only 6 have tallied 25+ (none over 49) answers. Sure would make people stop answering at all costs (unless they want to encourage some behavior) and would make for better quality questions, too.