First | Prev || Next | Last
¿Question #3807?
skelebone: If you could wipe out one manufacturer as though they and their games never existed, would you do so, and who would you choose?

pwilz: No. Man, you're disturbed.
ColdFrog: naw. I mean, someone probably still enjoys their games if they still exist, you know.
xofour: I would not do so, because I do not believe my tastes, sensibilities, or beliefs should be imposed upon others.
Phelanpt: No, I wouldn't. No matter how bad the games are.
Woelf: No
personwholives: No.
NezziR: Wow... no. I wouldn't. Wait... no, not them either.
Der Ubermolch: It seems unfair to do that, really. I can't think of any game companies that produce a lot of, and exclusively, totally unredeemable games
kingofthegrill: yes. eagle games
BeeCeeJay: Cheapass
ngajoe: Tempting, but I would not. Shadow is to Light as Hasbro is to Nearly Everyone Else Who Makes Games. Without the contrast, we wouldn't know how good some games really are.
galenochfarlig: Nope. All parts of the bg industry is better than a blank
GrimJester: no
2amp: none
Zarion of Arabel: wizards of the coast (NOT including TSR)
StraightJacket: EA doen and done
dante9: Yes and Milton Bradley...all of them!
jester27: I hesitate to say FFG - they ov
Geosmores: none that comes to mind
aleo09: no preferenc
Rliyen: Creators of Settlers of Catan
PopeBrain: no
cleonhard: Not that I can think of.
jcarvin: No. One man's trash is another man's trash. I'm just the garbage collector.
william_henshaw: Avalon Hill/Hasbro I mean how bad can their games get
DHEK: No. Why would I choose to destroy part of the boardgame industry!?
POvidiusNaso: Steve Jackson.
produceguy1765: no
Ebon Wendigo: Nope
Cut & Space: I wouldn't
W Eric Martin: University Games would be a good candidate, but it did release the American version of Ubongo, a possibly saving measure.
Otter: Hasbro should go.
Helenoftroy: mattel
Frankenfletch: Whoever made worse case scenario!
jasta6: not one I dislike that much........................................
Dorque: Nope.
vampywife: no, whether or not i like the games of a manufacturer, someone in the world might, so why take that away from them?
CherryPie: I wouldn't variety is the spice of life.
Salt-Man Z: Nah.
Chris Page: University Games.
Csteb: No desire to wipe a manufacturer out.
verandi: hm well I'm sure wiping out just one "popular" company wouldn't be enough to clear the path for mainstream america to embrace Euros, but I guess Hasbro?
skrutsch: No. The repercussions could be horrible.
brainrob: Hasbro
ChaosOrdeal: Jim Morison and the Doors, man, they suck!
Fawkes: No.
ctalbot: No way.
scriptorum: I wouldn't exercise the power. And that is the meaning of true power. Now make me some fudge brownies.
chrisisapimp: no
davebo: No
djlg: No. NA.
Cavedog_pdx: University Games
matthew.marquand: nope. There is no such thing as failure...
mrbeankc: none
MisterCranky: Yes. Milton Bradley, just to ruin all those classic game collections. Bwah ha ha!
Belash: I wouldn't because even the worst manufacturers provide us with something different.
sourwyrm: you don't have to buy every game you know
Lord_Prussian: I would not
snoozefest: no, i'm not that mean
jttm: Cheap ass games? Or maybe cardchess... which is worse?
CDRodeffer: I would not choose to do so. But if forced, ugg -- maybe Savant Garde.
Dave: Whoever it is that makes Bang!
CortexBomb: No, I wouldn't. All manufacturers exist to serve a given niche, so even though I might not like, say, Eagle's games, I still think they should be allowed to exist for their market
Spielfreak: No, I would not do so.
chaddyboy_2000: Sure, I'd wipe out whoever published Danger Guy.
skelebone: I don't know that I would eliminate anyone, though I wish Danger Guy had never existed.