First | Prev || Next | Last
¿Question #4213?
POvidiusNaso: If you could create world peace, but it meant that there would never be another puppy, kitten, pony, or baby goat, would you still do it?

PolarDad: Sounds like a deal
MartinWin: Yes. Animal babies are overrated.
Narlgoth: Nope.
NateStraight: No.
SophieMonster: No, the world will eventually be quite peaceful after it loses the atmosphere, everything dies and the core cools and solidifies. Peaceful, about like Mars. Oh, wait, Mars has avalanches. Nevermind.
jcaraway: Maybe. As long as it is unconditional world peace. One scuffle and BAM!! Puppies and Kids everywhere.
Felimid: Nope. A world without kittens and puppies in it isn't a world worth living in.
Septic: Yer damn rite even if it ment spelin difrentli
fliptrackr: sure
Woelf: Yes, and I choose the pony since I don't really like horses. People can ride goats instead.
Voxen: Yes. Humans rule. And another thing: Baby goats? Really?
laztheinfamous: Yes, I can't stand animals. Besides, you generally don't eat any of those animals.
Me 262 Schwalbe: No
MisterCranky: Sure. As long as we don't lose baby hedgehogs where's the problem?
Hector Vortac: That trade-off is acceptable.
warpozio: no, not the kitten!
OsmiumATOMasATOM: Certainly. Cybernetic simulants for these already exist. In fact, the colonization has already begun.
DHEK: Yes. There are still other cute animals around.
Numskull: I suppose so.
casrina: yes, without a second thought and never regret it. But it will never happen. Human are not civilized. Power corrupts Total power corrupts totally. Was true 4000 years ago and over all the years still is and always will be.
scriptorum: Death to baby goats!
aleo09: absolutely!
Ebon Wendigo: Yes
Drafey: Yes. It would be interesting as heck seeing a full grown dog get born. Hell of a birth.
ZiggyZambo: Yes, screw the baby animals.
Csigs: Then what would we eat?
Mutombo: no.
NMonter: Despite being a vegetarian, I might go with not having goats, I have too many bad memories growing up as a kid with goats trying to ram me to get food.
GornTC: Yes.
uunpuppy: Yes. There would still be river otters, macaws, and llamas!
XenoMaster: Yes
xlorp: Sounds like someone found a way to eliminate world hunger.
LEGION: NEVER world peace is overrated
Igloo cool: Sometimes, ya gotta break some eggs...
POvidiusNaso: If I did I think my wife would be mad at me.
Laudwic: yep, of course, puppys would be renamed Teddys after my dog
Deeghter: Nope!
Wouwter: nahh, 2 reasons, I love kittens, and I live in the good part of the world ;)
mrspank: In a heartbeat.
keldrak: yes
matriculate: Yes.
Whirlinghurly: puppy
SteveK2: I think you'd need to explain how everlasting world peace would work.
Favre4MVP: I was going to say yes until you threw the baby goat into the mix.
bigbadsteve: i would give it some thought
brainrob: No ... don't care about the first three, but goats cheese is superb
ZombyDawg: yes
beakermyers: Yes
rawdawg: no
skrutsch: yeah.
xscape: sure
fFish: Yes.
Jula: Yus. *cackles maliciously*
Cavedog_pdx: *sigh* The world just isn't ready.
Null Signature: that depends if i get to keep my emus...
Cerebus: Yes.
jttm: Yes
Culvan: Sure, why not. If it turns out that ponies cause war, I say we off 'em.
Lord_Prussian: Sure
Randy Cox: That's a win-win proposition.
skelebone: F yeah I would. I would sacrifice a few animal species for a lasting peace.
CortexBomb: Um, yes...I would get rid of puppies, kittens, ponies and goats on a lark without world peace even being in the equation actually
puffinge: Sure, I'd even give up certain people for it.
CDRodeffer: If the world peace is lasting, probably. For momentary world peace, no.
chaddyboy_2000: Yes.